Monday, July 23, 2018

Duncan Black, A Media Whore Online And A Hypocrite

If it were possible for me to sue Duncan Black for carrying the lies that Steve Simels has told about me on his for-profit blog for the past six or seven years, I would do it.

Duncan has certainly been aware that he publishes the lies told about me on his blog for years and has certainly done nothing to prevent that happening.  This afternoon, there was this exchage:

Avatar
Stëve Sïmels, blog malignancy • 2 hours ago
That Idiot From Maine©:
The very word which Hitler adopted as the name for his policy of,
not only invading Poland and other countries to the East, murdering 
almost all of their inhabitants (reserving a small class of slave, 
helots to serve the Aryan masters) but also to get rid of Jews,

He's writing a book called THE HOLOCAUST: JEWS WERE AN AFTERTHOUGHT


•Reply•Share ›
Avatar
geysergazer permanently cranky  Stëve Sïmels, blog malignancy • an hour ago
Six million dead: an afterthought. What an asshole.


•Reply•Share ›
Avatar
SufferinSuccotash, LockHimUp  geysergazer permanently cranky • an hour ago
Oh yeah, let's have a Wansee Conference.


So, as you can see, there is actual defamation published there.   It, of course, doesn't occur to these members of his "Brain Trust" (they really do call it that) that they might want to actually see what was written that they're commenting on.

I have pointed out the irony of Duncan Black having gotten his start in blogging through the encouragment of the long defunct and entirely better blog, Media Whores Online, dedicated to exposing the lies in the corporate media.  "The Horse" as she was known, encouraged Duncan who was considered something of a protogee, several articles he wrote were published there, including one that held Katha Pollitt responsible for The Nation which she was a columnist for.  The Nation, published articles by Christopher Hitchens, though, unlike Black, she had no responsibility for deciding what was published in the magazine.  Duncan Black does have that kind of control, he could stop Steve Simels from publishing libel at Eschaton any time he chose to.   I at one time made the mistake of being a regular at Duncan's blog and was rather supportive of him, defending him when he was criticized.  That was a mistake, he's a jerk.  I wonder if "The Horse" has seen what an ass her protogee is or if she cared or cares that he practices the kind of thing her blog was opposed to.

I am asked, from time to time, why I bother paying attention to the lying troll, let me ask you how you would like to have someone create the lie that Steve Simels has created about me if it were you.

5 comments:

  1. "the lies that Steve Simels has told about me on his for-profit blog"

    My FOR-PROFIT blog?

    Are you fucking insane? Seriously -- why am I even asking that question; obviously you are.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Published just as an example of the typical method of lying that Simels employs, leaving out crucial parts of what are said so as to lie about what it says.

      And this is something that he's done at Duncan Black's blog, with Black's knowledge for years.

      Delete
  2. Trumpism (just making shit up) seems to be a particularly NYC affliction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. It's a tactic I associate with Roy Cohn, Rudy Giuliani, the New York Post, various and sleazy regulars on cabloid TV, Victoria Toensing and Joseph diGenova, . . . yeah, it seems to be unusually prevalent in the lesser, greater NYC area. Apparently it's not objectionable at Tiger Beat on the Delaware, either. I think Duncan can't be bothered to care about it, I think the preppy got bored with that kind of stuff about the time he found out the Supreme Court had exempted blog owners from being sued by people who get lied about on their blogs. I remember him writing a post about how wonderful it was that he could follow the same standards as FOX and the rest of the media that "The Horse" held up to a standard he obviously had no intention of following, himself. I early figured him for more of a liberalish libertarian than an equal justice kind of guy.

      Delete
    2. Of course, he didn't put it in terms of him being able to publish lies with impunity, as I recall it was a "free speech" issue.

      Delete