IF THE ATHEISTS who invented multi-verse theory to support their materialist monism, and there is every reason to believe that is their motive, if they insist that one and two dimensional universes are real things, real things that cannot have material existence, then they have actually invented another disconfirmation of the basic claim of materialist monism, that matter (and the energy they were forced to accept as real) are the only thing that there is. They can either have their materialist monism or they can have the one and two dimensional universes they invented in their scheme to get past the fine-tuning of the one and only universe they have actual access to, You know, what scientists used to once consider the ultimate test of any scientific claim, and the People who notice that the Big Bang and the fine tuning rather supports the implication that God is the Creator of all of it. An implication, by the way, they are free to reject only, that's right, they can't believe they really are free to reject it because they also have to give up free thought because their ideology can't support that, either.
It's hilarious when you think of how much that discovery made from Einstein's evidenced theories freaked out the atheists, Hoyle one of the hardest cases and how much nonsense they pushed directly and successfully right into the heart of science to try to make it go away. Materialism is the origin of decadence, the elite variety as well as the vulgar variety of it.
So, to accuse me of making too big a deal of it is rather funny. I'm happy to be able to put your mind to rest, it was the atheists who started doing that before I'd learned to do long division and had the vaguest notion of what subatomic particles are.
I actually don't think any of this is very important, the consequences of it, other than leading to governments getting suckered into letting them make ever bigger colliders costing ever more billions of dollars so they can look for ever more fleeting things of ever more attenuated utility to keep God at bay (in their imaginations) the consequences of the widespread belief in natural selection and scientific racism is far more dangerous. That and suckering stupid people who can't do division without a calculator and probably couldn't balance an equation of one variable if it got too involved.
I don't think it's a surprise that three of the Four Horsemen of the new atheist fad of the 00s have turned out to be regressing to pre-war Darwinism, Christopher Hitchens to a cynical and self-profiting economic social Darwinism and Republican-fascism, Sam Harris to old line scientific racism and eugenics, the more careful Richard Dawkins playing the line of explicit endorsement of it on a few issues, careful not to go too far except when it comes to sexism. I'm not sure about Dennett on that, he never was the flashiest of them, more of an annoying little dog following the horses barking, not a serious member of the crew. It was really more the Three Amigos than Horsemen. I wouldn't even call them Musketeers.
Oh, and I will point out again that any atheist who believes, as their hero, Stephen Hawking said that the universes, free from the restraints of logic or physical law, universes having entirely different physical characteristics than our universe where we do mathematics to do such things in, then HE IS THE ONE WHO INSISTS THAT MATHEMATICAL OBJECTS ARE NOT PART OF THE REALITY WE CAN KNOW OF AS MATERIAL EXISTENCE. If they can describe non-material one and two-dimensional universes or any unreal thing then they are not a mere epiphenomenon of matter-energy, the thing that materialists insist comprises the entirety of existence. You can't have it both ways, Bunky, there's no reason for anyone to have gone this far with the imaginary Grand Design, it's an illusion created to support atheist ideology, not science. I'm kind of shocked how many otherwise intelligent people are suckers for it. It's sort of like Trumpism for the sci-ranger crowd. Intellectual Ivermectin peddling.
No comments:
Post a Comment