What Cannot Be Known Cannot Be A Scientific Argument So Resorting To It Is One Of The Internal Contradictions of AMS

WELL, keep in mind what I pointed out on the fact that every argument that human beings are capable of making or understanding is dependent on what they can know at the time the argument is made and heard.  Positing the atheist-materialist-scientistic false promissory note that someday that argument will be made and heard that explains it all is here, according to modern physics and mathematics which are the best which we have available, less credible than the claim that "somehow in heaven, somehow it will be even, some new equation given" because modern physics and mathematics hold that we can't attain that level of certainty about ultimate questions.  Which the arrogant atheist ideologue Sean Carroll had used against him when he claimed that a theory of everything was imminently had.  I'd say by who but . . . it's Lent and bragging isn't appropriate.

Unless, in the now, today, in 2021 you can answer those questions of how the materialist model of the brain, or "DNA" or "natural selection" or the "laws of the material universe" can do those things in regard to the brain making structures to "be" ideas before the ideas are present in the brain, there is every reason to disbelieve in materialism because if our minds escape the confines of materialist faith then it is invalid because it holds EVERYTHING must conform to it.  Considering all of the above, a belief in materialism in the 20th and 21st century is so quaintly 19th century as to be regarded with amusement.   So I am appropriately amused by atheist-materalist-scientism.  I'm thoroughly up to date in that regard. 

Update: Oh dear, "how is saying it's going to be known in heaven any better . . .

A. physics deals in physical matter, not in heavenly things, mathematics may well be an aspect of earthly experience, too.  I think it was Wittgenstein who said that he wasn't exactly certain that mathematics can be assumed to be valid everywhere in our universe.   If he wasn't why should I be?

B.  It is the belief of many in the Christian tradition that such mysteries of our life here will be knowable in heaven so making that speculation within that system is consistent, it is not consistent with modern atheist-materialist-scientism because their system does not allow making such claims and having them be internally consistent.