Friday, November 13, 2020

Alito said in a speech webcast to the legal society’s national lawyers convention, which was virtual this year because of the pandemic.

In case you're wondering what kind of crap in a tailored suit sits on the Supreme Court of the United States,  Samuel Alito told the Federalist Fascist society, which is meeting for a convention remotely due to the Covid-19 pandemic, . . . Alito told them BY WEBECAST that the kinds of restrictions for public safety which . . . It's just so disgusting I'll risk a cease and desist to post the whole thing.  

“We have never before seen restrictions as severe, extensive and prolonged as those experienced for most of 2020,” Alito said in a speech webcast to the legal society’s national lawyers convention, which was virtual this year because of the pandemic.

He added: “The covid crisis has served as sort of a constitutional stress test.”

Alito said he was not criticizing officials for their policy decisions — “I’m a judge, not a policymaker” — and said before launching into the speech that he hoped his remarks would not be “twisted or misunderstood.”

Alito, one of the court’s most conservative members, said it would be hard to imagine before the pandemic that speeches and concerts would be off-limits and that churches would be empty on Easter and synagogues vacant on sacred holidays. The Supreme Court itself has been closed to the public since March, and the justices hold their meetings and hear oral arguments via teleconference.

And while he said he wasn’t being critical, he said the restrictions on public gatherings and worship services highlighted “trends that were already present before the virus struck,” which he identified as a “dominance of lawmaking by executive fiat” rather than by legislators.
AD

Alito was in the minority this summer when the court in emergency orders upheld local officials who limited the size of in-person worship services in California and Nevada. He was particularly aggrieved that the governor in Nevada limited church attendance while allowing casinos to reopen at 50 percent capacity and called for visitors to return to the state. The 51st person in line for a church service was out of luck, Alito said: “Forget about worship, and head for the slot machine or maybe a Cirque du Soleil show.”

Alito’s blunt words are likely to reignite questions about how far Supreme Court justices should go in speeches. The court has a 6-to-3 majority with President Trump’s three nominees, but Alito sounded as if conservatives were outnumbered on the court and in society.

He worried about religious liberty becoming a second-class right — although religious conservatives won all three of their cases at the court last year — and that the Second Amendment was not respected. He repeated his criticism of the court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges that granted same-sex couples the right to marry. He told those watching that he predicted at the time that those who continued to hold to the notion that marriage is only between a man and a woman would be seen as bigots. “That is just what is coming to pass,” he said.

----------------

I hope Sheldon Whitehouse gets through a law that requires the Supreme Court to FINALLY reveal the finances and other integrity issues of its members because I'm betting several of them might be in such deep conflict of interest that they might get forced off of it.  I strongly suspect Alito is one of those. 

2 comments:

  1. The Nevada casino case is interesting. Business/money over worship, after all. Not really a civil liberties issue, IMHO, but it certainly indicates where priorities are. The decision can be criticized, but I’m not sure it raises 1st or 14th Amendment issues. Money talks, after all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm sure Alito couldn't care less about any of it, he's a scheming little piece of garbage, he is saying things tailored to have a political effect. It is rather an irony that he is saying that in the same speech he's furthering his campaign to nullify the rights of LGBT people to marry.

    I think the future actions of the Supreme Court are going to matter entirely on if the Republican-fascists keep control of the Senate. If they lose control, the Roberts court 6 will be a lot worse than if they have to worry about things like effective impeachment inquiries and the such. I see no evidence that the Republicans are made less reckless by the election,they are as bad as they figure they an get away with.

    ReplyDelete