Wouldn't you love to know what the judges and justices who proclaim the rights of violent brats to be in classrooms they repeatedly and violently disrupted would do if such children were in their courtrooms attacking them or the staff of their courtroom? I wonder if the rules for handling such violent children described by teachers and administrators were the same for courts, bailiffs staff, lawyers, JUDGES were the same as those they impose on schools if those idiots, so many of them and their own dear children the product of prep schools that would have booted such kids out in a heartbeat or never taken them on a students, might get a real education in real life if they had to live by the rules they make for public schools, teachers and which even the very youngest students have to live with.
Only you don't have to wonder because judges would throw such disruptive children out of their courtrooms, never tolerating what they order schools to do.
The hours of class time to recover from severe, repeated disruptions are not only not infinitely expandable, they're not expandable at all. The recovery time of children from being traumatized by violence in their classrooms isn't infinite, their ability to go back to learning after such an incident might disappear altogether for a long time.
There are children who do not belong in a general classroom because they are dangerous to the other students and teachers and other staff. There are children who do not belong in a general classroom despite their right to a public education BECAUSE THEIR BEHAVIOR PREVENTS NOT ONLY THEM BY ANY OTHER CHILD IN THAT CLASSROOM FROM BEING EDUCATED. I guess you have to be an elite lawyer or judge or shrink who likely has never attended a class required to pretend that the unrealistic commands of such people are true to keep pretending that such things as infinitely extensible time can be fit into the very limited time that schools have to try to educate children in safety.
That there is some theoretical danger that in some cases such things might be badly administered and have a discriminatory effect does not a single thing to mitigate the fact that such judicial unreality discriminates against all of those under their regime of unreality, preventing the safe education of even the very youngest of children.
No comments:
Post a Comment