Esquire: What do you think of Hillary?
Clint Eastwood : What about her? I mean, it's a tough voice to listen to for four years.
I repeat myself, that's as compared to the great voice of Donald Trump.
The career of Hillary Clinton and the response of the American media, from the New York Times right down to the sewer of hate-talk radio and FOX is like a giant psychoanalytic revelation of their hatred of women. Including the women who work in the media who would never tolerate being presented as they present Hillary Clinton. The same media that forms the collective mind of the American People and their decision of who they will vote for. A man with her resume would never be subjected to the treatment she has been.
The media is enabling the election of the least qualified man to have ever had the nomination of a major party. The 19th century had some really lousy presidents in it, even the worst of them, the least prepared, the least competent, the Franklin Pierces, the James Buchanans, were vastly more prepared to be president than Donald Trump. The former popular media favorite for the worst president in history, Millard Fillmore (I think superficially based on the sound of his name, not his actual record) was a tower of competence and integrity, as compared to Donald Trump. There has never been a worst major party candidate for president than Donald Trump and, just as with George W. Bush and Richard Nixon, the media is enabling them instead of opposing them. This time it is based on three decades of lying about Hillary Clinton, largely based on her being a woman. No man has ever been subjected to that treatment, no matter how obviously crooked and superficial and unhinged and just plain rotten. That is what we're learning this year because that list of attributes is the definition of Donald Trump.
No comments:
Post a Comment