OVER THE PAST year I've noticed an increasing number of those making pseudo-historical videos are obviously depending on AI to produce content. My response to those is to click on those that look like they might be that kind of crap less and less but I still do on occasion. One I clicked on a couple of days back was supposedly about Empress Elizabeth of Russia but which had many images entirely irrelevant to her and 18th century Russia, some of them images of Elizabeth I of England and clearly having something to do with England in her time. Other videos are even worse, mangling the chat-bot voice-over mixing all kinds of stuff together, using clearly inappropriate words as AI is quite likely to do and other stuff. Maybe they've turned the production of this crap entirely over to AI, not even bothering to watch them before they're posted to get that monitization money from Youtube.
I've noticed the same is sometimes true of those really annoying and unasked for AI "summaries" that now appear at the top of Google searches. I hope Google soon either drops those or they give an opt-out feature. Though I think it's very likely to twist the already twisted minds of a dangerously large number of the mid-brow who make up most of our so-called educated population. The "information age" has produced an even lower percentage of informed People.
But that's only relatively annoying and mostly innocuous. My doubts about so-called artificial intelligence increased about fifteen years ago when I first read about officials in the Pentagon anticipating using it for things like choosing targets to bomb and places to attack. Well, that's part of what the Israeli government and its military are doing in Gaza, right now, wiping out entire neighborhoods because their computer conjectures that a Hamas militant might be in the general vicinity. Which should be a war crime and, if it is, no one's doing much of anything to stop it.
Human Rights Watch assessed four tools that the Israeli military has used in its ongoing offensive in Gaza related to military planning and targeting. One is based on mobile phone tracking to monitor the evacuation of Palestinians from parts of northern Gaza. Another, which the military calls “The Gospel,” generates lists of buildings or other structural targets to be attacked. Another, which the military calls “Lavender” assigns ratings to people in Gaza related to their suspected affiliation with Palestinian armed groups for purposes of labeling them as military targets. “Where’s Daddy?” purports to determine when a target is in a particular location so they can be attacked there.
Am I the only one who thinks the Israeli establishment is unusually cynical and callous as demonstrated in the names they give their engines of murder?
Israel has a huge business in exporting its spying and repression technology to some of the worst regimes in the world, that's something that its been doing since well back into the apartheid era of South Africa, the dictatorships in Latin America and Asia so I have no doubt that they would be even more willing to sell it to the American government, in fact they have been making a lot of money out of teaching military and control tactics to local American police agencies - remember that as you watch the Trump II era military-police tactics used against demonstrators and, who knows, even those who don't demonstrate against Trumpian fascism. I doubt them using "artificial intelligence" would make them any less apt to kill and maim and terrorize people who are guilty of nothing more than demanding equality and democracy.
The more general point is that if the Israeli regime is doing this you can imagine that other regimes in other countries are doing it - there are none so superstitious about the value of "AI" as those who don't have a clue about it but are sold it as being of benefit to them. This is the new superstition, superstition with science and technology which is certainly going to be more dangerous because it magnifies and multiplies the power of those who choose to use it without much human intelligence or a shred of moral restraint. Secularism is every bit as capable of producing superstition as the worst of any other aspect of human culture and ideology. And, I'd argue, it's far worse because like science, secularism is divorced form any consideration of morality by common agreement.