THE OBJECTION TO me admitting the most obvious of truths, that when it comes to what has legal and political potency, THE CONSTITUTION MEANS NOTHING EXCEPT WHAT IT IS MADE TO MEAN IN REALITY, asks us to lie and to pretend to believe transparent lies, to pretend that Hollywood and Broadway, Aaron Sorkin-Ken Burns, high school civics fantasy is reality when we must live under something entirely at horrific odds with that fictitious fairy tale..
The Roberts Court lied when in SNYDER v. UNITED STATES, claimed that the Constitution as it was concieved of by those who wrote the thing made blatant, quid pro quo selling of politicians decisions and, BY THEIR OWN, KNOWN BEHAVIOR, decisions by Supreme Court members legal so long as the payment followed the delivery of what was being bought.
While, as something of a scholar on the real history of the slave-holders, crooked financiers and Indian murderers who wrote the Constitution, I have every faith that a lot of them would have done exactly that, themselves, NONE OF THEM WOULD HAVE BEEN SO CORRUPT AS TO PUT THAT INTO THE DOCUMENT, ITSELF. To do so would have been for them to reproduce some of the worst aspects of the monarchy they had just thrown off and those in Europe which they certainly knew the real workings of.
If you have read much of what I've written about this you would know that despite having studied the history of this I HOLD THERE IS NO REASON FOR US TO BE THE SLAVES OF THAT HISTORY OR THE LEGAL NECROMANCY OF THOSE PRETENDING WE OR THEY CAN DISCERN THE INTENT OF THOSE WHO WROTE THE DAMNED CONSTITUTION.
Even if the founders and framers were as corrupt in their explicit intent as John Roberts, Amy Coney Barrett, etc. pretend to belive they are IN ORDER FOR THEM TO GET TO THE RESULT THAT THEY FAVOR, why should we be governed by that when the evil consequences for us are what those liar-lawyers in black robes claim we must live with because of their occult reading of the two-century dead minds of those corrupt slave-holders, genocidalists and crooks was?
Even if the corrupt results that the Roberts Court gets were the consequences of well-meaning mistakes by the framers in coming up with the right words, WE STILL ARE UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO PUT UP WITH THE CORRUPTIONS THAT ARE A RESULT OF SUCH "ERRORS."
We, the ones who must live under the Constitution until its catastrophic consequences force us to either change it or live under those catastrophic conditions are under no intellectual, ethical or, most of all, moral obligations to put up with it. We who live in states where there is not a reliable American-fascist majority, that is, white supremacist majority are not under any obligation to live under it because of a current inability to muster the votes in the Congress or among the often corrupt state legislatures to reform or change the damned thing. I have said before that if it becomes obvious that it is now impossible for those of us living in less corrupt states will never have control of the federal government again, or even a good hope of that, we should break the country apart, there is nothing about the United States as an artificial entity that obligates anyone living in it to sentence their children, their great-grand-children or, as in my case, nieces and nephews, to live under the tyranny of white spremacy or, as is the case in many of the TV and social media addled in so many places, under their stupidity.
There is nothing in the Constitution, no, not even in the Bill of Rights, that means we can not learn the hard lessons forced on us living under it, whether from Bush II or Trump I and II that there is a dangerous and politically concentrated and dangerous coalition between the media-made-stupid and the white-spremacist-haters FUELED WITH BILLIONAIRE AND MILLIONAIRE MONEY that has produce the Satyricon levels of stupid corruption that we have lived under for going on sixteen years into this quarter over century.
If, as it is now obvious that there is somewhat over a third of the country that can force a Trump on us AND REELECT HIM DESPITE HIS DEMONSTRATED CRIMINALITY, INCOMPETENCE AND DESIRE TO SADDLE US WITH A CORRUPT MONARCH - WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE MOST CORRUPT SUPREME COURT IN OUR HISTORY* the only moral course is for the rest of us to take that as a given and face the horrible fact that much, most of what the framers based their structure of government on is not only wrong, it is fatally, dangerously wrong. Every means of reducing the political power of the states and their voters who send dangerous criminals to the Congress, especially the Senate, everything that leads to dangerous people like Bush II and Trump gaining the presidency EVERY MEANS OF PREVENTING THE RIGGING OF THE SUPREME COURT BY REPUBLICAN-FASCISTS AND THE MILLIONAIRES AND ILLIONAIRES THEY SERVE, must be taken, despite what the Constitution says, either as honestly read or as corruptly distorted by entities like the Roberts Court.
We have a moral obligation to face the terrible truth that free-speech-press absolutism AS DEFINED BY COURTS SINCE THE WARREN COURT have led us to the real life reality of what our country has become, A NATION RULED NOT BY LAWS BUT BY THE CORRUPT CRIMINALS THAT BELIEVED IN MEDIA FED LIES PRODUCES. The Warren Court made the first and most fatal decision in that line of corruption enabling rulings in 1964, things have been going steadily down since Nixon did what he couldn't do four years before that, win an election with media lying on his behalf. The media, the free press as it existed then was still doing that in 1972 even as his then unprecedented criminality was becoming known. The "justices" proved to be rather stupid about that, even though Warren, himself, as a former politician, certainly should have known better. Lawyering and the professional habits of them lying can make even the smartest among them total idiots.
So long as liberals and moderates and, well, I'll imagine I believe that such unicorns are real, principled conservatives buy into the nonsense that we are forever bound by whatever can be pretended the framers and founders intended we will never be safe under the Constitution. That is the foremost lesson for the future of our present catastrophe. We have been brought here under the rulings of the most corrupt branch of the government in American history, the Supreme Court, through their lines of "First Amendment" and "Second Amendment" rulings. Sullivan, Buckley v Valeo, Citizens United, Heller, and those ultimate and clearly anti-constitutional rulings, Snyder and Trump v USA. Despite the anodyne words of the MS-Now, online-liberal lawyers, that is the real meaning of the Constitution so long as we put up with it and the corruption that we now know is included under its framing of governance.
* The Roberts Court is a direct result of the corrupt decision of the framers to give the almost entirely anti-democratically constituted Senate the ability, such as was made clear, under Mitch McConnel and with the connivance of Republican members of the Court, that they can pack the Court to come up with those corruptions that the Roberts Court and the Rehnquist Court before it have brought us to. Since Bush v Gore, the Court has been as corrupt as it was since the Taney Court, and I would argue even more corrupt. That is a direct result of the anti-democratic atrocities embedded in the Constitution and the form of government it invented. We are under no obligation to pretend otherwise or to live with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment