Simps Said:

 

Dec 16, 2023

Even shorter Sparky: If it hadn't been for Charles Darwin, nobody's Jewish relatives would have been killed by the Nazis.

 

That's quite plausible because Nazism's eugenics which included its genocidal programs are a direct result of the belief in natural selection.  As I've noted here in the past, in direct response to such derisive snark we know that the German officer class and others who started the Nazi party were thinking in Darwinian terms during the First World War, as documented by the American biologist and quite conventional Darwinist, Vernon Kellogg.  We know that as Hitler was dictating Mein Kampf that he had been provided with the thoroughly Darwinist and eugenics textbook by Baur, Fischer and Lenz - not improbably the only biology book he ever may have read - that Nazi literature noted the influence of American eugenics - which was, by its own proclamation an outgrowth of Darwinism, that is, the theory of natural selection.   We furthermore have the definition of Nazism, "National Socialism" as being nothing but applied biology from Rudolf Hess.  To top that off we have the discussion at the infamous Wannsee Conference in which the theory of natural selection was given by at least one of the participants as the reason to murder all of the Jews because any that survived the brutal culling they were planning were believed by the Nazi participants in that incomparably brutal intellectual-technocratic meeting to be biologically superior and so would generate a population of Jews who would be an even greater "threat" to the imaginary Aryan German "master race," they fully believed, on the basis off Darwinism, to be creating.  In that they were merely the logical conclusion of things said by Darwin in On the Origin of Species and, especially, in the Descent of Man.  

 

If they would have come up with other excuses in the absence of Darwinism can't, of course, be known but how they thought of what they planned and did can be known and it is fully documented in, not only the secret literature that became apparent after WWII but in their public pronouncements and their propaganda.   There is absolutely no possible contradiction of that short of lying, as the conventional college-credentialed mainstream has been lying about it since the exposure of the atrocities of the Nazis.

 

And, as I have documented through his own words at the beginning of WWII, by that time probably the greatest living authority on the thinking of Charles Darwin to survive into the years of WWII, Leonard Darwin, repeatedly, over decades said that his own eugenics work was carrying on his father's work.  In April of 1939 he published an article in which he said German eugenics, that would be NAZI EUGENICS, had moved German legal and social policy in the right direction.  The article also noted that German Eugenics, begun by men like Wilhelm Schallmayer, was a direct result of their reading of On the Origin of Species.  No doubt they also read the far worse, Descent of Man in which, among other claims of beneficial murder,  Darwin repeatedly asserts that the deaths of those who he considered inferior were a boon to their survivors, even in cases such as the Tasmanian genocide, when it was done through such evil acts. 

 

If natural selection had never been invented by Darwin and Wallace, it's quite probable that there would have been no Nazi party.   

Update:  I don't care what the eejits of E-ton believe they know about something they don't know anything about.