I HADN'T SEEN the video of white-supremacist Krysten Sinema as she lied her friggin' head off in her anti-voting-rights speech last night so I didn't know that the allegedly former-Green, widely touted to be if not an atheist then a "non-theist" win for the anti-religion side Senator was wearing what looked to me not only like a cross on a chain around her neck but maybe even a crucifix? I've gone looking for a closer view of her and couldn't see it. Does this mean that as the lying, hypocritical, groovy-gal, thumbs-down on the worker-is-worthy-of-his-wage Senator has got religion as part of her ever changing, ever shifting shifty and always calculated identity? Or is it just part of her current theatrical costuming? She certainly hasn't shown any indication that she's gained a devotion to the teachings of Jesus so, as it generally is when someone shows they're wearing a cross like that, it's for show.
My conclusion at having watched her is that she is and always has been an amoral, self-seeking grifter who is far more interested in meeting with millionaires and billionaires to get money for her campaign fund, and, by the crooked laws of the land, herself than she is in anything she has purported to stand for. The truth as can be heard in her 2010 season act of opposing the filibuster and contrasting that to that disgusting, dishonest speech of yesterday in which she claimed to have not been that person is the piece of crap stands for nothing except her own attention-getting gain.
Arizona Democrats got duped by a con-artist, especially those on the left who probably thought it was groovy to have an ex-Green, pseudo-lefty, atheist as their Senator. There are other con-artists in that vile body but she has got to take the cake among those sitting with a "D" after their names now.
I called her speech an anti-voting rights speech and her a white-supremacist because she joins the long list of segregationist, white supremacists of the past who thwarted every civil-rights bill that was ever brought up in the past. The results of what someone does is what they really mean, not the lying words that they say as a fig leaf covering their shame. Only I doubt the racist piece of shit is capable of shame.
No comments:
Post a Comment