Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of TRUE speech, or of the press TO PUBLISH THE TRUTH; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
To tell you the truth, considering how judges,"justices" etc. are fully capable of pretending they're too stupid to be able to do things like tell the truth from lies, religion from hucksters gulling the marginally sane and stupid into not only giving them money but doing stupid and terrible things, the problems go a lot deeper than merely addressing the worst aspects of the Bill of Rights. You'll have to entirely change the culture of the legal racket to get far in this. I have absolutely no doubt that most judges and "justices" can tell the difference but so many of them are as capable of pretending not to for the most corrupt and base of reasons and the others know they're going to get overturned if they don't play that game that it will take removing those who either are that stupid or pretend to be, giving them that to worry about. I'd start by removing Kavanaugh for lying through his teeth during his confirmation and go on from there. As I recently pointed out every single person in the room at the Roberts and Alito hearings knew they were lying through their teeth as much so, just not as brazenly.
If the Congress or other legislatures made liars vulnerable to civil action or loss of license or otherwise were driven out of business, I anticipate having far fewer problems with that than I do things as they stand now. If liars were so removed from the media the quality of Congress and the state legislatures would improve enormously.
I'd make religion prove that at least 75% of their intake goes to legitimate charitable purposes for the least among us, too. There should be definitions of what is and what isn't religion. You can start by excluding the grifters from that category.
Update: I really don't care what Simps listens to, if he likes it, good for him as long as I don't have to listen to it. It's not immoral. It's not like listening to Toby Keith.
No comments:
Post a Comment