Saturday, July 29, 2017

Saturday Night Radio Drama - Rex Stout's Nero Wolfe - Cordially Invited To Meet Death





I've been called out so I don't have time to list the cast,  I'll put it up later if I can. 


Stars: Mavor Moore, Don Francks, Cec Linder, Frank Perry, Alfie Scott
Special Guest Stars: Barbra Hamilton, Terry Tweed, Lynn Deigon, Ken James, Tom Harvey

Music by: Don Gillis

15 comments:

  1. "I certainly don't think the unbroken chain of Ivy League rule we've had
    can be seriously argued to have been good for the country or the world...you obviously have some kind of dom-submissive relationship with the Ivy type"

    First of all, as I mentioned earlier, you could more credibly lament the pernicious effect of the unbroken chain of Christian rule we've had. Second of all, my significant other went to the conspicuously non-goyishe and non-Ivy Brandeis, you hick anti-Semitic ignoramus piece of shit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would like you to identify the things that the United States government does that you could intuit the Gospel of Jesus, the Epistles of Paul etc. from. Of course, you couldn't because you don't know any more about those than you do The Law or the Prophets. I would willingly be governed by the teachings of Jesus any day.

      I'll address BG when she comes here and makes a total lying asshole out of herself or when she lies about me at Duncans Daycare For Dotty Duffers. So like you to bring her into this. Remember the last time that happened, it went so well.

      I strongly suspect you couldn't have gotten accepted at Brandeis, where Arthur Berger was a beloved and valued member of the faculty and, as I recall, an Emeritus Professor after his retirement from regular teaching.

      Delete
  2. When he runs out of thoughts, he turns to personal invective. Invariably.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Remember the last time that happened, it went so well. "

    I do indeed. It involved you indulging in disgusting misogynist fantasies about her doing porn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OH, yeah, everyone in the world knows how gay men just love to think about elderly women doing straight porn, especially those who are opposed to porn.

      What happened is I put the question to you that if nothing is wrong with porn would you be willing to have your.... well as close to loved ones as you have, other than yourself, have a career in porn. I asked you if you'd be OK with the woman who you have sex with having sex with all kinds of men who had had sex with lots of women who had had sex with lots and lots of men who had also had sex with lots of women, creating the perfect vector for, among other things, passing on HIV and other incurable STDs. Of course you lied and said you'd be OK with it when I know you wouldnt. The proof of that is you objecting to the idea that she could possibly have made that decision. I won't call it a "choice" because most of the people involved in porn are compelled to participate.

      What does the straight porn you support consist of other than "disgusting misogynist fantasies". The difference between us is that I'm opposed to porn, you support it. Therefore the "disgusting misogynist fantasies" are all your own. Like your plaint that you'd "never get to make it with a goth chick". Though, every perversion having an expression, I'd imagine you can play a role in necro-fantasy, you're pretty much there from the neck up.

      Delete
  4. Somebody needs to arrange an intervention for you. And soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you keep these pat responses on a Rolodex and just spin one before you insert it out of context into the discussion? You really are quite stupid.

      Delete
  5. Replies
    1. Yet another cliche from the simple mind of Simels.

      Delete
  6. The Pee-wee Herman gambit yet again? Good move, Sparkles.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Define "the Pee-wee Herman gambit".

      Paul Reubens has something you don't, originality. He has a third thing you don't, comic talent.

      Delete
  7. You really have no idea what I'm referring to?

    Oh god, that's the cream of the jest.

    Here's a hint -- go to the IMDB and look up dialogue from PEEWEEs BIG ADVENTURE. Or just say to a random stranger "I know I am..." and see what they say in response.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I watched the movie a long time ago. You can't define a "Pee-wee Herman gambit," can you.

      You are a really, really stupid old man, aren't you. You're Archie Bunker with a different set of bigotries and pretension.
      I'm told Skepsy changed his name to remove the reference to crap. Well, you can take the tank out of the name but what went in it is still there.

      Delete
  8. You genuinely have no idea. Its astounding.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's nothing astounding in you spouting empty, irrelevant, out of context cliches instead of making arguments out of ideas and then claiming that I don't because you've been doing that since before 2012, just about every day. It's remarkable since I don't go to your blog or Duncan's to pick fights with you, it's as if you love getting your ass kicked which I have done every time it has happened. If you hadn't started doing that I would probably have never written a word about you, anyone else who wastes their time at Eschaton or Duncan Black because none of you does much of anything worth writing about EXCEPT in so far as you typify what went wrong with the American left. And there are better and more interesting examples of that in the lefty magazines and writers.

      Delete