Good For Thee And Thine But Not For Me And Mine

As always,  Stalker Geezer is lying when he now accuses me of making "a vile attack" against his now ailing girlfriend.

Not that I think his baby blue buddies care but here's what happened.

A few years back, after S.G. had attacked something I wrote against the porn-prostitution industry and the hypocrisy of the pseudo-liberals who champion  the "rights" of pornographers to destroy people, I asked him the same question I ask all such frauds, if they think porn is so great, would they be OK with their family, their children, their parents, their siblings, their spouse - or since I knew he was unmarried, HIS GIRLFRIEND - to do what happens in porn, be penetrated in whatever way, to do whatever act that porn directors and producers order the people who appear in porn to do.    

I make that challenge to point out what hypocrites they are because, no, they would never want their children, parents, spouses or girlfriends to have to be penetrated vaginally, anally, orally by another man or several men who had, similarly and on orders of porn producers, directors and, um.... well, "writers" to penetrate other similarly used women, children and men.  I may have listed some of the many vile and disgusting things that the porn that S.G. championed forced people to do, things that exposed them to infection, that degraded them, that tortured and damaged them in my question.  He's the one who's OK with those things being done to anyone, not me.

 I do recall that he lied and said it would be OK with him if HIS GIRLFRIEND did those things because he couldn't deny her a career in "show biz".   I didn't believe it for a second and I'm sure I told him he was lying at the time.  

That, now, he's saying that what he claims to be totally OK with happening to other people, when proposed as a possibility for someone he loves,  someone he cares about is a "vile attack" on HIS girlfriend (as she recuperates from surgery) only proves my point about such supporters of porn-prostitution.  It's entirely OK as long as it's someone else's child, parent, sibling, spouse or girlfriend who is abused, infected, damaged and destroyed by porn.   And, yes, folks, in the perverted twisting of the word in the past century, that double standard is now know as "liberalism".

Such "liberalism" is what the secular left now almost uniformly consists of, it is a kind of neo-liberalism that has had its most notable success in discrediting real liberalism which would never be anything but entirely against that kind of violation of the rights and dignity of other people and the class of people who are destroyed by porn and prostitution.   That neo-liberalism will always end up reinforcing inequality as is being discovered as young women and girls are expected by boys brought up on the reinforcement of their privilege and entitlement to do what they see done to women in porn. The same can be said about men and boys under the domination of the inequality and self-hatred reinforced by gay porn.   That happens whenever you put commercial privileges, including those of the media, over the equal rights owned by every person.

Update:  Duncan Black has knowingly published vicious lies about me almost daily for years, I am entirely within my rights to consider him an asshole as well as good percentage of his current regulars.  I think his blog's useful days were over about a decade ago and apparently most of those who used to regularly comment there don't think it's worth bothering with regularly or at all, today.   He's hardly even going through the motions these days except to ask people for money as he does nothing.  He's a grifter with a PhD from an Ivy League school.

Update 2:  And Simps does it again at Duncan's blog, demonstrating the truth of what I said about him and Eschaton.   I think the left would be a little bit better off if Duncan found a job and stopped going through the motions.

Update 3:  "oldest joke in the world" a. you should stop being so fixated on yourself, b. figures you'd rely on repeating the oldest joke in the world instead of coming up with something original, c. the joke is in your hand.