I want a show of evidence right now, HOW MANY OF YOU PEOPLE WHO ARE CONDEMNING HILLARY CLINTON OVER THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT WERE ON RECORD WHEN IT PASSED AS OPPOSING IT ON THE GROUNDS THAT A BUNCH OF REPUBLICAN-FASCISTS WOULD LIE ABOUT IT (REMEMBER THE GREAT GINSBURG DISSENT WHICH SAID THAT'S WHAT THEY DID) TO DESTROY EQUAL HEALTHCARE RIGHTS FOR WOMEN?
If you can't prove you could foresee what the Roberts Court did by lying about what the law said and what the clear legislative record proves was meant by it, at the time it was passed, to great approval by real and pseudo-liberals, then you should shut your pie holes now. And that includes all of you bloggers who were probably still focused on acne and concealing your adolescent, involuntary erections back then.
Update: I'm really disgusted to read commentators on blogs blaming Hillary Clinton for the Alito-et al's use the law in the Hobby Lobby ruling because her husband signed the law into effect. This is especially aggravating because her title was "First Lady" at the time, a position without legislative or executive powers. And, as noted below, it is a law which not a single liberal predicted would be used by lying "justices" in a corrupt future court in the way this one has and, as far as I can see, every single liberal in the congress, both houses, voted for with the widespread approval of liberals.
A lot of the anti-HC snark comes from the same jerks who made sexist remarks about her in the run up to the 2008 election on blogs that were cesspools of sexism then and which turned on Obama as soon as he began to not be the miracle worker they sold him as being.
A left comprised of ignorant crybabies will get nothing done and undo anything they can pout about. And on so many blogs, the pout is what it's about.
No comments:
Post a Comment