I don't care what Duncan's blog rats say about anything. They spew old, worn out, predigested attitudes, they never challenge their prejudices or assertions they took on in conformity to the milieu they chose to be a part of, some as long as a half century ago. They never test their ideas. They're just a different flavor of bigots, they're the failed past that pissed away the progress made by real radicals like Diane Nash, the Reverend Martin Luther King jr. and so many others. As people wedded to the millstone that sank the left, they're less than undeserving of attention. As persistent and insistent agents of futility, they are best ignored.
Insisting on doing the same things over and over again and expecting a different result. Nothing will ever come out of that but more failure.
Remind me again, Sparkles -- what color were the armbands the Nazis made Christians wear in the death camps?
ReplyDeleteI know some of them were made to wear purple triangles. Of course, since many millions of those murdered by the Nazis were Christians many of them wore other identifying patches as the Nazis stored them for eventual death.
DeleteI'm not aware of what they made priests and other clergy wear in the concentration camp where they kept and killed them at.
Edith Stein and other Christian converts who were Jews probably were made to wear yellow ones.
I saw that comment by RoadMaster or whatever his name is, you dolts didn't expect there to be an answer to that, did you.
Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. Look him up, Simels, you ignorant ads.
ReplyDeleteSimels doesn't care about people like him.
DeleteCoulda sworn I'd spelled that right. Stupid cell phone.
DeleteSo the principal victims of the Holocaust were Lutheran theologians?
DeleteThat's an interesting, albeit self-serving take.
Since no one said that Lutheran theologians were the "principal victims" you had to pretend they did. It's what you do when you've got nothing, pretending people said things they didn't.
DeleteAnd, of course, you only care about the "principle victims" because the other millions of people killed by the Nazis, "meh".
I pointed out to you the other day that the term "Holocaust" refers specifically to the Jewish victims of the Nazis, though I agree with those who prefer the term "Shoah" for that. By definition the ONLY victims of the Holocaust are Jews. The Holocaust doesn't account for all the victims of the Nazi murders, accounting, by the estimate of the Virtual Jewish Encyclopedia, 6/11ths of the total number.
You know, Simps, since catching your act I've come to be convinced that if the Nazis hadn't murdered Jews but Poles, other Slavs, gay men, the disabled, etc. you'd be pretty well as "meh" about that as pseudo-lefties have been about the huge numbers murdered by Stalin and Mao and others.
You think like a Nazi, caring only about the group you identify with. They only cared about the group they identified with, too, just like you. Lots of us refuse to think like a Nazi. Among other things, asserting that gives your fellow Nazi equivalents an excuse to only care about the group they belong to.
" Lots of us refuse to think like a Nazi. "
ReplyDeleteNo, you think like a Holocaust denier. Just like Donald Trump. He doesn't think the Holocaust was about the Jews either, as we learned earlier this year when he omitted any mention of Jews on a day dedicated to Holocaust remembrance.
At first, when I saw the abandon with which you and Freki lied when the refutation of your lie was on the same page, or, as in this case, in the comment you responded to, I was amazed. Then I found out that on Duncan's blog and other places where you inhabit, that as long as you spouted the in house line of lies, they'd go with the lie and not with the refutation that was right there, on the screen in front of them. It was a real insight into the atheist mind and the consequences of not believing in sin and, therefore, not believing that it was a sin to lie.
DeleteI just noted that the majority of those murdered by the Nazis were Jews, or maybe you don't understand how ratios work.
Atheists destroyed the American left with their lies.
So say what you will about the Nazis, but they seem to have been far more efficient about wiping out Jews than any other group.
DeleteWhy do you think that was, perchance?
You say that as if you think it's admirable. Or that you've got nutthin' though that's your steady state.
DeletePop quiz, Sparky:
ReplyDeleteWhat did the residents of the Warsaw Ghetto have in common?
Hint: It wasn't that they were all short.
What did the first victims of the Nazis, murdered in gas chambers have in common, Simps? Since I know you don't care about them, though they were mentioned in the one and only book about the Nazi period you've skimmed, Berlin Diary, I'll point out, it was that they were disabled, one of the groups murdered by the Nazis I've never seen you acknowledge.
DeleteI suspect I've probably read more about the Warsaw Ghetto, the conditions in it, the planned murders of all its residents, the uprising, the duplicity of some of the Communists, though not all of them, the survivors and witnesses than you.
I suspect if Hitler had only killed all the Poles you'd be OK with that.
I don't have time, I imagine you're repeating the lies you're spouting here at Duncan's, where no one who cares about the truth will read it.
"I suspect..."
ReplyDeleteWhich is the equivalent of Trump's "Many people say..."
I.e., a sure sign that you're pulling nonsense straight out of your anal cavity.
That's stupid even by the standard of stupidity you set.
DeleteYou could admit that you'd be as OK with the murders of the Naxis if they hadn't murdered Jews, you know, the approximately 5 million people whose murders you figure is "meh" a detail too unimportant to consider. No, not merely unimportant, but something which, if mentioned, is offensive and a moral outrage.
You think like a Nazi and you lie like a Trump, mixing fluency of lying with stupidity.