Monday, September 26, 2016

On Listening To The Psalms

Well, a while back I went through the exercise of down loading the audio collections of individual Psalms, I divided them into 30 separate computer files of five each day - to make a full cycle of all 150.  I didn't do so thematically, I merely started with 1-30 for each day of the month and then the four 30, 60, 90 and 120 more than the date.  So the first of the month I've listened to Psalms 1, 31, 61, 91 and 121.  There are loads of plans for reading through the Psalms, some of them are thematic or with some higher plan in mind, the one  I chose is kind of simple-minded but it is a way to go through all of them 12 times in a year without having to flip around in a book.   A less lazy person might read them but I'm having more eye-trouble than usual just now.   I, for the first time, can imagine that I might have to resort to signing up for Talking Books, eventually.  Though I imagine they do it a lot differently now than they did when my father used them.

The randomness of it can be beneficial,  interesting, listening to highly contrasting Psalms, one after another can be jarring, in a good way.

Someone in response to one of the videos I posted of Walter Brueggemann talking about Psalm 73 came up with one of the stupider lines from Brit TV comedy about how tiresome the Psalms are, I don't know how anyone who really paid attention to them could think they were tiresome.  Going through them can be like a exercise in emotional and intellectual stretching, as Brueggemann suggested in one lecture or interview, trying to imagine what would bring someone to say what is said in them, it can be an exercise in both empathic imagination and self-reflection.  I suspect doing that would be both a lot more useful and a lot cheaper than going to see a shrink, though, since they don't charge you three figures an hour to convince you that someone else is the reason you're unhappy, it wouldn't be as superficially gratifying.   I can imagine many of the texts of the Bible and other scriptures could do the same.  I can well imagine going through Suras of the Koran or scriptures from another religion in a similar way, given similar depth and contrast.

This short excerpt in which Brueggemann talks about the Psalms of Vengeance and how they could be used is a good way to deal with some of the most troubling of the texts.


One of my posts last week contained an excerpt that discussed the genocidal General Trotha accusing the Christian missionaries of whipping up the Herero people he was murdering with bloodthirsty passages from the Jewish scriptures, which is a pretty telling thing for a man responsible for scores of thousands of murders to accuse someone else of, as if people under an oppressive colonial regime which is enslaving and killing them couldn't get those ideas all on their own.  It certainly isn't how most people, even oppressed people have reacted to those texts.  They have a far deeper, far more serious use than the anti-religious bigots, either murderous colonial generals from the 19th century or tedious Brit-atheist comedians of the 1970s would like them to have.   I'm finding that they are a far deeper mental workout than the alternatives.   They're certainly a far deeper spiritual tool than a very partial, very superficial reading of them could find.

4 comments:



  1. "Someone in response to one of the videos I posted of Walter
    Brueggemann talking about Psalm 73 came up with one of the stupider
    lines from Brit TV comedy about how tiresome the Psalms are,"

    That was a) me; b) quoting Monty Python, who will still be listened to 100 years from now, as opposed to that Brueggemann wanker; and c) the descrption in the quote was "depressing", not "boring."

    ReplyDelete
  2. I do wonder how, if the Biblical texts are so full of bloodshed and inspirations to violence (which sounds more like modern literature and especially "premium" television, which when it isn't showing naked females (rarely fully nude males), is cranking up the violence as high as it can), why were the American slaves so passive, their Christian beliefs so inspiring of peace and love that when it came time to challenge the laws 100 years after the Civil War and the Amendments more honored in the breach than in the keeping, they turned to a Christian pastor and fought violence with peace, beatings with submission, arrest with songs and courage?

    I mean, shouldn't all that study of such "violent" books have led them to greater violence themselves? Or is it because they took those books more seriously than their white oppressors ever cared to?

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's the magic of secularism that when you make it all about materialism and sex it's innocuous. Like Lothar Trotha, when he was setting up the death camp 36 years before WWII, his genocide was non-violent as compared to those pesky missionaries reading the book of Judges or Kings. Being religious means always having to say you're sorry, even when no one got hurt.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's the magic of secularism that when you make it all about materialism and sex it's innocuous. Like Lothar Trotha, when he was setting up the death camp 36 years before WWII, his genocide was non-violent as compared to those pesky missionaries reading the book of Judges or Kings. Being religious means always having to say you're sorry, even when no one got hurt.

    ReplyDelete