something occurred to me that I haven't heard anyone address. Their un-constitutional declaration last year that presidents are immune from prosecution when they break the law as an "official act" of the presidency mixed with the idiotic provision that is actually and dangerously IN THE CONSTITUTION means that the president, on his own, can effectively make laws that, if future presidents chose to take them up and continue or even expand them, they could put into effect in perpetuity without the Congress doing it, that continuing as long as the heretofore and likely never will happen removal of a president by impeachment doesn't stop it. And no one he orders to implement said law would be prosecuted if he gave them a pardon for it, even the courts would be disempowered by the Roberts Courts actions to stop that law ever being the real law of the land, in concrete fact instead of Ivy League lawery-liarly non-reality.
If you have any faith in the Supreme Court, especially this corrupt Roberts Court overturning a president pardoning himself or corruptly making a deal with the VP to pardon him on his stepping down from office - as I have always believed Gerald Ford made with Richard Nixon - you are as stupid as an old line "civil liberties" liberal.
Since the Roberts Court has said that Trump could violate the law and even deport People without any judicial review preventing that from happening - even to third countries where the People being deported, to their almost certain torture and likely risk of death with the blessings of Roberts, Alito, Thomas (the RAT in this court) Goresuch, Kavanaugh and the fradulent "moderate" Amy Coney Barrett clearly they are all in on that actual, concrete, presidential law making stuff, 100%.
I will be writing a post on the uses of negative stereotypes, the condemnation of those as an abstract proposition running up against the reality of those members of groups who actually do the things that the stereotype contain, seemingly giving some TRUTH TO IT and why objecting to calling that out is a massive and currently very dangerous practice of alleged "civil libertarians" and others such as who pose as that while promoting some of the greatest evils of our day - but as you can see from that description of the very real phenomenon, laying it out is rather complex and getting out of that complexity towards clarity is not the easiest thing to write. But I do have to ask, as an Irish Catholic of the kind who takes both the The Gospel, foremost, and the Law and the Prophets and the best of the Christian tradition extremely seriously, what kind of Catholicism formed the six fascists who are sitting on that Court right now. ALL OF THEM had an alleged Catholic formation, if my memory of their bios is correct, ALL OF THEM ARE DESTROYING EGALITARIAN DEMOCRACY TO SET UP THE MOST IMMORAL, AMORAL, CROOKED AND STUPID PRESIDENT OF OUR LIFETIME TO BE SUCH A DICTATOR AS I DESCRIBE ABOVE AND TO KEEP THEIR CROOKED FASCIST PARTY IN POWER FOR PERPETUITY AGAINST THE WILL OF THE MAJORITY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
I have no problem with someone asking that question, a question which, I will point out, anti-Catholic bigots have pointed out in the past - leaving out such as "justice" Sotomayor who are more in line with the Catholic tradition than those six whited sepulchers in black robes. THAT question will come into play in that post I'm undertaking but want to say just right.
No comments:
Post a Comment