Saturday, May 24, 2025

Since I Don't Care

about sports - could never understand why I was supposed to care who won and who lost a frickin' game, including when I was forced to play - I didn't think about what the latter-day FOX Lies robo-blonde Riley Gaines claim to fame consisted of and how it implodes her hate shtick and the use of trans-athletes by our neo-fascists.   

Here's how the estimable NTodd put it in the comments here.

"an accomplished athlete" = highest career finish was 5th place (the one she tied with Lia Thomas), failed to qualify for an Olympic qualifying event (lol), then retired from swimming to make money on the hate grift. "

I hadn't thought until I was washing the floor, thinking about this that as Lia Thomas was tying with Aryan Blondie, Thomas merely tied for an also-showed place AND A NUMBER OF NON-TRANS WOMEN BEAT BOTH OF THEM. 

If the problem with trans-women athletes is that they have some competitive advantage over those who are assigned biological females at birth,  how come several such non-trans females  beat both Lea Thomas and the FOX style robo-blonde?   I wonder what other sports records of trans-women losing or winning against those assigned female gender at birth would show as to the validity of that complaint.   Someone should ask the FOX hate skank that question,  I haven't read that anyone has brought it up to her yet. 

14 comments:

  1. " Since I Don't Care about sports - could never understand why I was supposed to care who won and who lost a frickin' game" ----------------------------- Sparky, I've said it before, but you really are a desperately poor pathetic sad bastard. The fact that you never got to enjoy one of the most harmless, innocent pleasures that 99.999999999999999 percent of the normal human beings on the planet take some solace from at some point in their lives, and seem to be proud of it(!), is truly remarkable. Three words: The Brooklyn Dodgers. Three more words: The New York Mets. I should -- Jackie Robinson. Also -- if you don't appreciate Hank Aaron in the same way as poetry or music, you're such a miserably unhappy human being I don't know if I can even feel sorry for you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is so hilariously NOT AN EXPLANATION of why I should frickin' care about who wins a game that I may have to write an entire piece about it. "Brooklyn Dodgers" Yeah, I know how much that means because they haven't existed since the owner of the team moved it to another city, you're mooning over a corpse that died a lifetime ago. "Mets" yeah, I'd like to know how much the fans of their competitors care about them winning or losing.
      Jackie Robinson isn't a game, he was a human being. Or are you that stupid that you don't know the difference?

      Delete
    2. " I know how much that means because they haven't existed since the owner of the team moved it to another city, you're mooning over a corpse that died a lifetime ago". Oh my god, you really don't get it. It's a poetic metaphor, you poor pathetic loser asshole.!!!!!!!

      Delete
    3. As I recall I've pointed out to you before that you don't know what a metaphor is, you confirm that, yet again.
      So, Simels, tell me why I should care about who wins and loses a game any more than you would care who won a match of vortmozaikoj? Or a game of studle?

      Delete
  2. "Tll me why I should care about who wins and loses a game" ...............Something about "fun," you sad shithead. A concept you clearly have no understanding of. And damn, you're such a putz I can't bring myself to feel sorry for you. 😎

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's stupid to find a form of so-called entertainment in which half of the People participating and half of those watching are going to feel bad about the result fun. And it's mean. I mean like a mean 7th grader kind of mean. No wonder Trump is such a fan-boy of sports. I think entertainment in which the goal is to make everyone happy is a lot more fun.
      Admit it, Simps, you're just a jr. high mean gurl at heart.

      Delete
    2. Apparently you've never read "The Boys of Summer." Or "The Natural." 😎

      Delete
    3. I read The Boys of Summer, I prefer men who grow up and realize what's really important in life.
      You really expect me to get all sentimental about what the most conventional of convention tells me that I'm supposed to feel sentimental about even though no one's able to tell me why I'm supposed to feel that conventional way about it. No wonder you had a career in the bottom end of magazine journalism, it's what a career producing verbal schlock is all about. What next, why I should respect the Supreme Court?

      Delete
  3. "No wonder you had a career in the bottom end of magazine journalism, it's what a career producing verbal schlock is all about." So writing for a magazine is verbal? Interesting. No, actually, not interesting -- hilariously stupid. 😎

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You really will never make up that day in 4th grade when they taught about using a dictionary, will you.

      verbal
      1 of 2
      adjective
      ver·​bal ˈvÉ™r-bÉ™l
      Synonyms of verbal
      1
      a : of, relating to, or consisting of words
      verbal instructions
      b : of, relating to, or involving words rather than meaning or substance
      a consistency that is merely verbal and scholastic
      —B. N. Cardozo
      c : consisting of or using words only and not involving action
      verbal abuse

      Yet you had a career at the bottom end of magazine journalism without knowing what "verbal" means. Really, if I'd realized how stupid you could be and have a career in "journalism" I might have figured it would be an easy way to make a living. You never learn, do you, Simps. I'd be wasting words to advise you again to use a frickin' dictionary before you try to best me on a point like that. Only, since no one who pays attention to you is likely to ever come here and see what a putz you are, the eejits of Eschaton, the rump remnant of the glory days nineteen years or so back.

      Delete
  4. Right. Print media are verbal. That’s nice, dear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Clearly you think you know better than the lexicographers at Merriam Webster. I prefer to trust their research than yurass.

      Delete
  5. Books = verbal. Sure thing, Sparky. 😎

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You just can't stand that the dictionary proves you wrong, can you. What are yours written in? Pictograms? Rebus? Though you don't seem to be overly familiar with books so maybe that explains it.

      Delete