Simps Tells Me He Dissed Me At Duncan's Idea Of An Athenæum - A Bored Response

I'D BE SURPRISED if Rachel Maddow did the research and cited the numerous uses of Darwin's claimed science in Nazis racist scientific claims or their propaganda that I've done here and as many others have also done.   She's smart enough to know she would lose a major segment of her audience if she told the truth about that.  Having no money at stake or caring if people don't read me, I'm not going to avoid the topic.  This is The Thought Criminal, after all.  While what she produces about history is important and often very, very well researched, often finding things that others have not found, generally rising above the typical popular-history style, she is hardly in the business of creating a full view of the origins and motivations of Nazism.   I, like Stupy, have not read her recent book about a Nazi plot involving American collaborators and, so, don't know why she may not have dealt with the Darwinian aspects of their race science.   I have done that, over years here and I have produced the primary documentary evidence proving not only the connections of all of that Nazi science to the theory of natural selection, I have documented its continuation in post-war and current neo-Nazism, again, using what the neo-Nazis have said about what inspired their ideas.  

Simps is too stupid to take any of that in, he's the kind of college-credentialed idiot who had their sole and undeveloped and primitive conceptions of such things in the early 1960s when the post-war lie that Darwinism had nothing to do with eugenics was ubiquitous in that milieu,  I believed it, myself, for a long time until I undertook to do what almost no English language true believers in the plaster St. Darwin have ever done, ACTUALLY READ WHAT HE SAID.  And going on from there to read what his inner circle of supporters said - especially following up Darwin's own scientific citation of their writing - which proves beyond any doubt that natural selection was the motivation of eugenics in the English language and in Germany.   I have noted the articles and books by his own sons tying him to eugenics, people who knew him in person, unlike Rachel Maddow and anyone born after 1882 who never laid eyes on the man, never mind knew him as intimately as his own sons.  

I could go over it all again but I know Simps and his ilk will never look at the primary evidence, depending on secondary and, most likely tertiary and more remote sources that are as likely to lie about the primary record as any TV show about it will - probably where most of them got everything they know on the subject from.   I'm only interested in addressing those who will look at the real, primary record to see what Darwin, Galton, Schallmeyer, Haeckel, Baur, Fischer, Lenz, . . .  said and say about their conclusions from the theory of natural selection.  When I rarely cite secondary or later sources I always note that and always try to find primary source verification of what they say.  I have never found a single source from before WW2 who denied the link between Darwinism and natural selection or the theory of natural selection and Nazi eugenics, including Leonard Darwin who continually confirmed that his father's role in producing the Nazi eugenics of the 1930s that led, directly, into their genocides.   I've given the citations and often links to online publication of what they said.  

Update:   "National Socialism and Christianity are irreconcilable."  Martin Bormann

Update 2:  See second stupid comment below.  

Simps, if you're not even going to try it's not worth it to give you even this level of attention.  I don't have all the leisure time of a member of "the Eschaton brain trust" (they really do believe that's what they are), I'm still in demand for my work.  

Update 3:  Apparently the ever graying geezers of my generation with nothing better to do with their too much leisure time are keeping Duncan's cash cow going.   I don't get regular reports of Simps bringing me into it anymore, apparently the person who used to tell me gave up on it.  It hasn't been interesting since about 2005.   It's more of a bad habit than a stimulant.