Tuesday, September 2, 2025

The White Supremacist Who Trolls Me Reacting To My Morning Post

 brings up a gay Democratic politician who holds a city office WHO HAS NEVER BEEN ACCUSED OF PEDOPHILE SEXUAL ABUSE - so of course I will not post his slander.   I could give him a long, long list of Republican-fascists who have been credibly accused of child rape and molestation as well as those who have been prosecuted and convicted of everything from child rape to having pedo-porn.    


Of course Donald Trump has been credibly accused.  You know,  Jeffrey Epstein's best friend for a number of years,  whose first wife was pals with Epstein's fellow child molester and groomer, Ghislaine Maxwell.   One of the young women who was groomed by Ghislaine Maxwell said the first Mrs. Trump was with Maxwell when she first tried to entice her to get involved with Maxwell's and Epstein's child peddling operation.   She said Maxwell gave her a piece of junk jewelry that Ivana was peddling on the Home Shopping Network - she said it was such junk she threw it away.   And Trump and his lawyers are the ones negotiating Maxwell lying about Trump being innocent in exchange for putting her in Club Fed and, no doubt,  will get the pedophile rapist, abductor and peddler a pardon.  It was Trump's former Labor Secretary who gave Epstein the sweetheart deal,  his AG whose daddy gave him his first opportunity at that elite prep school,  Trump who used to be the only other man at parties full of, otherwise, teenage girls.   Clearly the current policy of the Republican Party is to enable him doing that because that's exactly what they're doing. 

I've told you before that I don't post slander and libel against third parties.   As for Nambla, I searched for a list of Democrats who were involved with that and I can't find any accusations.   I couldn't find anyone in the short list of named supporters I assembled from online sources who was even a member of the party at one time.   Tell me who you're accusing?    You're really not very good at coming up with flack.   Try searching my blog to see what I've said about that bunch in the past.  

Update:  Simps must have a guilty conscience

You frickin'  idiot,  I did that so People would know THAT I DIDN'T MEAN YOU WHEN I SAID "THE WHITE SUPREMACIST WHO TROLLS ME."    I think you've got a definite bias for white-bread pop musicians over Black artists which may be merely bad taste but I wouldn't accuse you of white supremacy.    Maybe what Norman Finkelstein calls "Jewish supremacy" but it's really not my call to make on that>  Definitely NYC area supremacy, which, by the way, is hardly the same thing.   I've know lots of gentiles from the lesser greater NYC area who are as chauvinistic about that piddling distinction as you are.  

So, here, for any Eschaton eejits who may have looked at that post (yeah, right, the Eschatots bothering to find out what someone actually said,  they don't even bother with what someone actually said two comments away from their whinging and whining about it)  I did not intend to imply that Simps was a white supremacist,  though I will state that he's a semi-literate-post-literate idiot and habitual liar.   If I believed in the same current Darwinian fundamentalist superstition that he does I might say "congenital" but I doubt such character defects are inherited,  they're learned. 

Update 2:  The white supremacist wants to slander the politician in question over a law he proposed that sought to regularize the legal status between vaginal sex and oral and anal sex.   The Republican-fascist, white supremacist, typical of his kind wants to turn that into some kind of promotion of gay sex.  What he doesn't seem to realize is that most of the anal and oral sex that happens in the world happens between male and females,  by any kind of survey evidence in the matter.     The politician he targets didn't try to lower the age of consent for sexual activity - the presumably majority straight legislative body did that in the original law lower than I'd think it should be set, all he asked is that it be regularized for other forms of sex.   If the white supremacist wants to object to that law without the slander against a named politician WHO HAS NEVER BEEN ACCUSED OF ANY KIND OF SUPPORT FOR PEDOPHILE SEXUAL ABUSE except by him,  I might agree to discuss it with him.   


5 comments:

  1. "I don't post slander and libel against third parties."

    Oh. So the implication in the post below's headline -- that I'm a white supremacist -- was merely the result of sloppy writing, not deliberate malice.

    Glad we've got that cleared up. ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for your attention to this matter. ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    ReplyDelete
  3. "You frickin' idiot, I did that so People would know THAT I DIDN'T MEAN YOU WHEN I SAID "THE WHITE SUPREMACIST WHO TROLLS ME." "

    Why would you feel the need to tell people you don't think that I'm a white supremacist?

    Jeebus, you really can't hear yourself. ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not because of my regular readers, other than the trolls, but because I used to frequent Duncan's blog and others where I found out how reading-deficient so many with college-credentials are, such as you. I knew some of them, like you, wouldn't get the distinction.

      Delete