Stupid Mail - Why Should I Care What A Stupid Man Thinks He Thinks About What I Didn't Say?

HE'S TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND that the whole point of that little post answering someone who challenged what I said the other day is that there is nothing like complete understanding of the simplest mathematical objects, 1 certainly being quite simple and rather an important number.  The whole point of it was that if the presumption that there was anything like complete understanding of anything in mathematics and, so, the physical sciences is absurd.  Physics being entirely dependent on mathematics.  It was an extension of the thing I got the massively arrogant and ideological cosmologist Sean Carroll to admit, that physics has nothing like a complete and comprehensive knowledge of a single electron in the universe which made his claim that a Theory of Everything was almost in hand entirely absurd.  

Simps is on safe ground distorting what I said at the Eschaton "brain trust" (which they have been known to call their daycare for superannuated lefties) because none of them ever come here to see if he's lying or not.  They don't care.   One of the reasons I don't care what they think they think.

My point is that no mathematician would make such claims about the objects they deal with, never mind the entirety of mathematics while those professionals in the more attenuated and speculative and contingent fields of physics and cosmology have been getting away with such claims for most of the last century and longer.