Ah, They Lie At Eschaton And The Ones Who Don't Lie Don't Care About It

Oh, dear.  I'm told Simps is making with the libel over at Duncan's den for the louche liars again and this time Freki is getting in on the act.  That Brit liar is claiming I advocated the killing of British children when anyone who has ever read me will know that one of my major topics includes criticizing the depravity of Darwin, Malthus, Carlyle, such others as Karl Pearson, etc. included the attacks they made on the British poor, especially the poor children who, her great hero, Charles Darwin, complained were allowed to live to adulthood.  He not only complained that they might, somehow in the depraved British system get adequate food in order to grow up in health, he complained that the criminality of the poorhouses, which starved inmates, especially, children to death on rations designed to starve them kept some of them alive.  I also criticized the enslavement of the children of the British poor as part of the New Poor Law Darwin complained kept too many British children alive. even under rules that included incentives for their enslavers to starve them or to work them to death because they were paid to take even more children from their parents under the law.  Her hero, Darwin explicitly complained such children were kept alive in too great numbers under such British institutions.  Darwin also explicitly complained that smallpox vaccination kept too many British children alive (a position his son, Leonard, featured in his unsuccessful run for Parliament).  Karl Pearson complained because such medical care as cesarean section kept children (and presumably their mothers) alive who would have died if a natural birth had failed.   

The first and most immediate victims of Darwinist depravity were the British poor, they were victimized by the Malthusianism that Darwin imposed on nature even before he got started doing that.  As well as the Irish who were also subjected to the same depraved death camp system under British imperial rule, and more. (Apropos of yesterday's play, Brendan Behan was absolutely delighted when, after he first appeared on a Brit broadcast, a Cockney told him that he understood every word Behan said but he couldn't understand the toff who interviewed him.  The Irish have more in common with the British poor than they do those who oppressed both groups.)

I have criticized the British Fabians, other than Karl Pearson, for their depraved policies which, in some of their celebrity members, such as George Bernard Shaw, advocated the murder of British people (and others) in gas chambers decades before the Nazis adopted such ideas.  

So, Freki is lying, as always.  Atheists don't feel any hesitation to lie if they figure they can get away with it because they don't believe in sin so they don't figure it's a sin to tell a lie. 

I'm surprised DAS didn't refute Simels' lie about me being an anti semite because he knows very well I'm not.  I don't know if he still reads me but he certainly used to at my first blog.  I used to read his blog which was quite fascinating and a constant surprise at the complexity of Rabbinic Judaism.  Wish he still wrote it.  Under his influence I'd contemplated attending the Masorti synagogue two towns over.  Unfortunately at the time I didn't like the Rabbi.  The newer one is very nice.  Very nice, indeed - if I were about thirty years younger...  I settled for studying the Hebrew Scriptures more intensively and have discovered that they are about the greatest and most complex of any scriptures and that the Christian tradition makes no sense except as understood through them.  Christianity is Judaism for gentiles. 

As I've mentioned over and over again, Simels definition of anti semitism means that someone who wishes that there were more Jews living in his country as full citizens, enjoying the full range of rights he does, or even that the United States had donated land for an independent Jewish Homeland which almost certainly would have been safe and secure and democratic and flourishing instead of merely existing in a condition of permanent warfare since the day it was founded.   Simels, for some reason, doesn't seem to want to have more Jews living in the United States or a Jewish homeland where Jews can live in a state of peace.  Apparently he likes the idea that they will play the same role in the depraved vision of Armageddon that the pseudo-Christian psychopaths favor.  

If the Supreme Court had not made that 1996 ruling protecting website owners from the libels their commentators posted I would certainly consider suing Duncan Black who has hosted lies like that for the past five years.  He has allowed all kinds of lies to be repeated on his blog, he doesn't seem to care that it is used for that, he barely cares that they don't read what he wrote.  It's a cash cow for the formerly promising young, now aging and unpromising blogger.  He doesn't care about its contents much.