You haven't raised any new issues that I haven't already dealt with in the posts about eugenics, Darwinism, Nazism and neo-Nazism in October and November. If' you're not going to read what I've already written, I don't see why I should write it again for you to fail to read it in the future. Especially as this new venue of research is quite eye-opening in ways that you certainly won't like any better than my documenting the use of Darwin's Natural Selection by probably the most scientifically qualified of the hard core neo-Nazis, William L. Pierce. His use of what Daniel Dennett called "Darwin's Dangerous Idea" to promote his neo-Nazi program, including, beyond doubt, his atheist-millenialist vision of the extermination of most of the world's population in favor of those who would have had Hitler's approval has certainly added an ironic potency to Dennett's forumlation.
"In dieser Funktion nahm er Selektionen vor."
There is nothing, nothing whatsoever that's unfair about pointing those things out. And there is nothing unfair about the fact that you can't refute the fact that the neo-Nazis have found Natural Selection so useful for their purposes and that they still do. Selection was what it was all about, the judgement of those such as Dr. Joseph Mengele replacing alleged Natural Selection. The job description of the medical officers at Auschwitz, if I remember correctly, included that word in doing what Natural Selection is supposed to do, select those who will die by its action. If you read the neo-Nazi websites, again, at your own risk, you will see that they're big on selection, they being the selectors.
No comments:
Post a Comment